1.3.5 Reward system and incentives - Revision history

Antonbespalov at 05:50, 6 October 2021

2021-10-06T05:50:36Z

Antonbespalov: /* C. Resources */

2021-10-06T05:50:09Z

‎C. Resources

Bjoerngerlach: /* C. Resources */

2021-04-07T15:59:31Z

‎C. Resources

ChristophEmmerich at 10:33, 15 February 2021

2021-02-15T10:33:58Z

Isabel A. Lefevre: Corrected broken link on MERIT Prof

2021-02-08T12:40:06Z

Corrected broken link on MERIT Prof

Bjoerngerlach at 12:18, 5 September 2020

2020-09-05T12:18:55Z

Bjoerngerlach: Created page with "== A. Background & Definitions == EQIPD Quality System relies on and should become part of the overall organizational quality culture. The introducti..."

2020-09-01T11:34:29Z

Created page with "== A. Background & Definitions == EQIPD Quality System relies on and should become part of the overall organizational quality culture. The introducti..."

New page

== A. Background & Definitions ==

EQIPD Quality System relies on and should become part of the overall organizational quality culture.

The introduction of a quality system will require efforts from every team member.

Rewards and incentives can help to motivate people to work together for a common goal, such as good research quality.

== B. Guidance & Expectations ==

EQIPD does not expect any formal documents or analyses to be conducted. However, it is highly desirable that the Process Owner reviews the rewards and incentives and, if necessary, aligns them with the quality objectives: Do we encourage / support publication of negative results?

Are high-quality results recognized / rewarded irrespective of the outcome (positive/negative)?
Are people encouraged to develop and implement risk-mitigating strategies and procedures? Are these efforts recognized?
Are people encouraged not to rush experiments but to invest time and resources in developing/using robust methods, optimizing experimental set-ups and to conduct experiments properly according to high-quality standards (even if it takes more time than initially allocated)?
Are internal processes reviewed to make sure that there is no pressure to generate positive results? If there is such pressure, are there processes to mitigate the risks?
When evaluating new job applications, is attention paid to rigor of applicants’ research?
What reward systems/incentives work in your specific environment:
monetary?
badges?
public praise?
gifts?
Does the RU have a reward system to incentivize certain behaviors (e.g. team work, innovation)? Monetary or not.
If yes, is the reward system used to support your quality goals, good research quality, transparency and open science attitude?

'''PLEASE DO NOT FORGET'''

To make sure that the research team members are fully aware of the reward / incentives

== C. Resources ==

The Quality Assurance & Training Connection (QATC): Sixty Simple Recognition and Reward Ideas https://qatc.org/winter-2016-connection/sixty-simple-recognition-and-reward-ideas/

Experiences from the pilot phase of implementing research assessment reforms for hiring professors at BIH/Charité - MERIT-PROF

Financial incentives to support re-use of open data, preregister and to publish negative (null) results - BIH QUEST examples

----------------
back to [[Toolbox]]

Next item: [[1.4.1 Research ethics]]

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 == C. Resources ==
-Experiences from the pilot phase of implementing research assessment reforms for hiring professors at BIH/Charité - [https://sfdora.org/2019/10/20/rewarding-robust-and-reproducible-research-experiences-from-the-pilot-phase-of-implementing-research-assessment-reforms-for-hiring-professors-at-bih-charite-merit-prof/]
+* [https://qatc.org/winter-2016-connection/sixty-simple-recognition-and-reward-ideas/ The Quality Assurance & Training Connection (QATC): Sixty Simple Recognition and Reward Ideas]
-Financial incentives to support re-use of open data, preregister and to publish negative (null) results - [https://www.bihealth.org/en/translation/innovation-enabler/quest-center/calls-and-awards BIH QUEST examples]
+* [https://sfdora.org/2019/10/20/rewarding-robust-and-reproducible-research-experiences-from-the-pilot-phase-of-implementing-research-assessment-reforms-for-hiring-professors-at-bih-charite-merit-prof/ Experiences from the pilot phase of implementing research assessment reforms for hiring professors at BIH/Charité]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 7 April 2021
Line 34:		Line 34:
	Experiences from the pilot phase of implementing research assessment reforms for hiring professors at BIH/Charité - [https://sfdora.org/2019/10/20/rewarding-robust-and-reproducible-research-experiences-from-the-pilot-phase-of-implementing-research-assessment-reforms-for-hiring-professors-at-bih-charite-merit-prof/]		Experiences from the pilot phase of implementing research assessment reforms for hiring professors at BIH/Charité - [https://sfdora.org/2019/10/20/rewarding-robust-and-reproducible-research-experiences-from-the-pilot-phase-of-implementing-research-assessment-reforms-for-hiring-professors-at-bih-charite-merit-prof/]

−	Financial incentives to support re-use of open data, preregister and to publish negative (null) results - [https://www.bihealth.org/en/~~research~~/quest-center/~~initiatives/~~ BIH QUEST examples]	+	Financial incentives to support re-use of open data, preregister and to publish negative (null) results - [https://www.bihealth.org/en/translation/innovation-enabler/quest-center/calls-and-awards BIH QUEST examples]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 ** public praise?
 ** gifts?
 * Does the RU have a reward system to incentivize certain behaviors (e.g. team work, innovation)? Monetary or not.
 ** If yes, is the reward system used to support your quality goals, good research quality, transparency and open science attitude?

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 The Quality Assurance & Training Connection (QATC): Sixty Simple Recognition and Reward Ideas [https://qatc.org/winter-2016-connection/sixty-simple-recognition-and-reward-ideas/]
-Experiences from the pilot phase of implementing research assessment reforms for hiring professors at BIH/Charité - [https://sfdora.org/2019/10/20/rewarding-robust-and-reproducible-research-experiences-from-the-pilot-phase-of-implementing-research-assessment-reforms-for-hiring-professors-at-bih-charite-merit-prof/ MERIT-PROF]
+Experiences from the pilot phase of implementing research assessment reforms for hiring professors at BIH/Charité - [https://sfdora.org/2019/10/20/rewarding-robust-and-reproducible-research-experiences-from-the-pilot-phase-of-implementing-research-assessment-reforms-for-hiring-professors-at-bih-charite-merit-prof/]
 Financial incentives to support re-use of open data, preregister and to publish negative (null) results - [https://www.bihealth.org/en/research/quest-center/initiatives/ BIH QUEST examples]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Rewards and incentives can help to motivate people to work together for a common goal, such as good research quality.
 == B. Guidance & Expectations ==
@@ Line 22: / Line 21: @@
 * Does the RU have a reward system to incentivize certain behaviors (e.g. team work, innovation)? Monetary or not.
 ** If yes, is the reward system used to support your quality goals, good research quality, transparency and open science attitude?
 '''PLEASE DO NOT FORGET'''
 To make sure that the research team members are fully aware of the reward / incentives
 == C. Resources ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == A. Background & Definitions ==
 EQIPD Quality System relies on and should become part of the overall organizational quality culture.
@@ Line 7: / Line 5: @@
 Rewards and incentives can help to motivate people to work together for a common goal, such as good research quality.
 == B. Guidance & Expectations ==
 EQIPD does not expect any formal documents or analyses to be conducted. However, it is highly desirable that the Process Owner reviews the rewards and incentives and, if necessary, aligns them with the quality objectives: Do we encourage / support publication of negative results?
-Are high-quality results recognized / rewarded irrespective of the outcome (positive/negative)?
+* Are high-quality results recognized / rewarded irrespective of the outcome (positive/negative)?
-Are people encouraged to develop and implement risk-mitigating strategies and procedures? Are these efforts recognized?
+* Are people encouraged to develop and implement risk-mitigating strategies and procedures? Are these efforts recognized?
-Are people encouraged not to rush experiments but to invest time and resources in developing/using robust methods, optimizing experimental set-ups and to conduct experiments properly according to high-quality standards (even if it takes more time than initially allocated)?
+* Are people encouraged not to rush experiments but to invest time and resources in developing/using robust methods, optimizing experimental set-ups and to conduct experiments properly according to high-quality standards (even if it takes more time than initially allocated)?
-Are internal processes reviewed to make sure that there is no pressure to generate positive results? If there is such pressure, are there processes to mitigate the risks?
+* Are internal processes reviewed to make sure that there is no pressure to generate positive results? If there is such pressure, are there processes to mitigate the risks?
-When evaluating new job applications, is attention paid to rigor of applicants’ research?
+* When evaluating new job applications, is attention paid to rigor of applicants’ research?
-What reward systems/incentives work in your specific environment:
+* What reward systems/incentives work in your specific environment:
-monetary?
+** monetary?
-badges?
+** badges?
-public praise?
+** public praise?
-gifts?
+** gifts?
-Does the RU have a reward system to incentivize certain behaviors (e.g. team work, innovation)? Monetary or not.
+* Does the RU have a reward system to incentivize certain behaviors (e.g. team work, innovation)? Monetary or not.
-If yes, is the reward system used to support your quality goals, good research quality, transparency and open science attitude?
+** If yes, is the reward system used to support your quality goals, good research quality, transparency and open science attitude?
@@ Line 33: / Line 27: @@
 To make sure that the research team members are fully aware of the reward / incentives
 == C. Resources ==
-The Quality Assurance & Training Connection (QATC): Sixty Simple Recognition and Reward Ideas https://qatc.org/winter-2016-connection/sixty-simple-recognition-and-reward-ideas/
+Financial incentives to support re-use of open data, preregister and to publish negative (null) results - [https://www.bihealth.org/en/research/quest-center/initiatives/ BIH QUEST examples]
@@ Line 52: / Line 41: @@
 Next item: [[1.4.1 Research ethics]]