4.2.3 Responsible conduct of research - Revision history

Anton.bespalov: /* C. Resources */

2020-11-03T15:36:21Z

‎C. Resources

Anton.bespalov: /* C. Resources */

2020-10-29T17:22:15Z

‎C. Resources

Anton.bespalov: /* C. Resources */

2020-10-29T17:20:04Z

‎C. Resources

Anton.bespalov: /* C. Resources */

2020-10-29T17:19:56Z

‎C. Resources

Anton.bespalov: /* C. Resources */

2020-10-29T17:15:18Z

‎C. Resources

Bjoerngerlach: Created page with "== A. Background & Definitions == This item refers to one of the Core Requirements (Core Requirement 5 - "The research unit must have..."

2020-09-03T11:01:15Z

Created page with "== A. Background & Definitions == This item refers to one of the Core Requirements (Core Requirement 5 - "The research unit must have..."

New page

== A. Background & Definitions ==
This item refers to one of the [[Core Requirements]] (Core Requirement 5 - "The research unit must have a procedure to act upon concerns of potential misconduct") and is, therefore, considered as essential.

Please see Toolbox item [[1.4.1.1 Research integrity]] for background and definitions.

== B. Guidance & Expectations ==
The research unit (or the research organization to which the research unit belongs to) must have a uniform and robust procedure in place to deal with potential research misconduct:
* A central and known to all researchers "speak up" mechanism for research misconduct concerns must be in place.
** This could be an ombudsperson or research integrity officer or an anonymous mailbox or a confidential electronic "hotline" from where concerns are triaged to a dedicated person.
** This could be a person of trust identified in the neighboring research unit or organization and who would be in a position to deal with violations and allegations of misconduct in agreement with the national or institutional guidelines. Please see also the [[FAQ]] section.
* In general, allegations of misconduct are handled by a standing or ad hoc investigation committee taking into account the required expertise and potential conflict of interest.
**The ENRIO handbook on Recommentations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct is a good resource for practical recommendations.

It is advised that the procedure, including the speak-up (anonymous reporting, whistleblower policy) and the investigation mechanism, is described and documented in a single file in the Dossier and the research unit informed about it via Email or in group meetings.

'''PLEASE DO NOT FORGET'''
* Research misconduct is a sensitive topic and has to be handled with maximal care, fairness, and integrity
* To provide training on research integrity and document it
* To make sure that every member of the research unit knows how to report potential misconduct

== C. Resources ==
* The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ALLEA) [https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/]
* WHO Code of Conduct for responsible researh [https://www.who.int/about/ethics/code-of-conduct-for-responsible-research]
* ENERI Research Integrity & Research Ethics Manual [http://eneri.eu/reri-manual/]
* ENRIO Handbook on Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct [http://eneri.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/INV-Handbook_ENRIO_web_final.pdf]
* German Research Foundation [https://www.dfg.de/en/research_funding/principles_dfg_funding/good_scientific_practice/]

----------------
back to [[Toolbox]]

Next item: [[4.2.4 Key performance indicators]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:36, 3 November 2020
Line 37:		Line 37:
	* [https://ori.hhs.gov/research-clinic US ORI The research clinic]		* [https://ori.hhs.gov/research-clinic US ORI The research clinic]

		+	Examples and guidance on building institutional policies:
		+	* [https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/415175/bis-15-200-whistleblowing-guidance-for-employers-and-code-of-practice.pdf Whistleblowing: Guidance for employers and code of practice]

	----------------		----------------

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 Training and learning resources:
 * [https://www.eur.nl/en/about-eur/policy-and-regulations/integrity/research-integrity/dilemma-game Erasmus University dilemma game]
 * [https://ukrio.org/publications/case-study-packs/ UKRIO case studies]

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 * [https://ukrio.org/publications/case-study-packs/ UKRIO case studies]
 * [https://ori.hhs.gov/research-clinic US ORI The research clinic]
 ----------------

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 Training and learning resources:
-* [https://www.eur.nl/en/about-eur/policy-and-regulations/integrity/research-integrity/dilemma-game Dilemma game]
+* [https://www.eur.nl/en/about-eur/policy-and-regulations/integrity/research-integrity/dilemma-game Erasmus University dilemma game]
 ----------------

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:15, 29 October 2020
Line 23:		Line 23:

	== C. Resources ==		== C. Resources ==
−	* The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ALLEA) [https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/]
−	* WHO Code of Conduct for responsible researh [https://www.who.int/about/ethics/code-of-conduct-for-responsible-research]
−	* ENERI Research Integrity & Research Ethics Manual [http://eneri.eu/reri-manual/]
−	* ENRIO Handbook on Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct [http://eneri.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/INV-Handbook_ENRIO_web_final.pdf]
−	* German Research Foundation [https://www.dfg.de/en/research_funding/principles_dfg_funding/good_scientific_practice/]

		+	Essential reading:
		+	* [https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/ The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ALLEA)]
		+	* [https://www.who.int/about/ethics/code-of-conduct-for-responsible-research WHO Code of Conduct for responsible researh]
		+	* [http://eneri.eu/reri-manual/ ENERI Research Integrity & Research Ethics Manual]
		+	* [http://eneri.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/INV-Handbook_ENRIO_web_final.pdf ENRIO Handbook on Recommendations for the Investigation of Research Misconduct]
		+	* [https://www.dfg.de/en/research_funding/principles_dfg_funding/good_scientific_practice/ German Research Foundation]
		+
		+	Training and learning resources:
		+	* [https://www.eur.nl/en/about-eur/policy-and-regulations/integrity/research-integrity/dilemma-game Dilemma game]

	----------------		----------------

4.2.3 Responsible conduct of research - Revision history

Anton.bespalov: /* C. Resources */

Anton.bespalov: /* C. Resources */

Anton.bespalov: /* C. Resources */

Anton.bespalov: /* C. Resources */

Anton.bespalov: /* C. Resources */

Bjoerngerlach: Created page with "== ​​​​​​​​​​​A. Background & Definitions​ == This item refers to one of the Core Requirements (Core Requirement 5 - "The research unit must have..."

Bjoerngerlach: Created page with "== A. Background & Definitions == This item refers to one of the Core Requirements (Core Requirement 5 - "The research unit must have..."