ARRIVE 2.0 - Revision history

Bjoerngerlach at 09:36, 29 September 2020

2020-09-29T09:36:27Z

Bjoerngerlach at 09:36, 29 September 2020

2020-09-29T09:36:04Z

Bjoerngerlach at 09:35, 29 September 2020

2020-09-29T09:35:35Z

Bjoerngerlach at 09:35, 29 September 2020

2020-09-29T09:35:07Z

Bjoerngerlach at 16:21, 5 September 2020

2020-09-05T16:21:31Z

Bjoerngerlach at 16:20, 5 September 2020

2020-09-05T16:20:58Z

Bjoerngerlach at 16:20, 5 September 2020

2020-09-05T16:20:27Z

Bjoerngerlach at 16:19, 5 September 2020

2020-09-05T16:19:45Z

Bjoerngerlach at 16:19, 5 September 2020

2020-09-05T16:19:21Z

Bjoerngerlach at 16:18, 5 September 2020

2020-09-05T16:18:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:36, 29 September 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~~~== A. Background ==	+	== A. Background ==
		+
	Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved.		Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:36, 29 September 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	== A. Background ==	+	== A. Background ==
	Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved.		Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:35, 29 September 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== A. Background ==		== A. Background ==
−
	Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved.		Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:35, 29 September 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== A. Background ==		== A. Background ==
		+
	Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved.		Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved.

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 |-
 |[[ARRIVE Essential - Experimental animals]]
 |a. Provide details of the animals used, including species, strain and substrain, sex, age or developmental stage, and weight.
 b. Provide further relevant information on the provenance of animals, health/immune status, genetic modification status, genotype, and any previous procedures.
 |-

@@ Line 44: / Line 44: @@
 b. Provide further relevant information on the provenance of animals, health/immune status, genetic modification status, genotype, and any previous procedures.
 |-
 |[[ARRIVE Essential - Experimental procedures]]
 |For each experimental group, including controls, describe the procedures in enough detail to allow others to replicate them, including:
 a. What was done, how it was done and what was used.
 b. When and how often.

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 |a. Clearly define all outcome measures assessed (e.g. cell death, molecular markers, or behavioural changes).
 b. For hypothesis-testing studies, specify the primary outcome measure, i.e. the outcome measure that was used to determine the sample size.
 |[[ARRIVE Essential - Statistical methods]]
 |a. Provide details of the statistical methods used for each analysis.

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 |-
 |[[ARRIVE Essential - Sample size]]
-a. Specify the exact number of experimental units allocated to each group, and the total number in each experiment. Also indicate the total number of animals used.
+|a. Specify the exact number of experimental units allocated to each group, and the total number in each experiment. Also indicate the total number of animals used.
 b. Explain how the sample size was decided. Provide details of any a priori sample size calculation, if done.
 |-

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 == B. ARRIVE Essential 10 ==
-{|
+{| class="wikitable"
 |[[ARRIVE Essential - Study design]]
 |For each experiment, provide brief details of study design including: