Spot checks - Revision history

Bjoerngerlach at 11:52, 16 August 2021

2021-08-16T11:52:56Z

Antonbespalov at 12:29, 13 August 2021

2021-08-13T12:29:08Z

Antonbespalov at 12:24, 13 August 2021

2021-08-13T12:24:53Z

Antonbespalov at 12:23, 13 August 2021

2021-08-13T12:23:28Z

Antonbespalov at 12:23, 13 August 2021

2021-08-13T12:23:11Z

Antonbespalov: Created page with "For a spot check, data / experiments may be selected randomly to see how well the RU is doing by finding answers to questions like ‘how easy is it to retrieve and reconstruc..."

2021-08-13T12:13:11Z

Created page with "For a spot check, data / experiments may be selected randomly to see how well the RU is doing by finding answers to questions like ‘how easy is it to retrieve and reconstruc..."

New page

For a spot check, data / experiments may be selected randomly to see how well the RU is doing by finding answers to questions like ‘how easy is it to retrieve and reconstruct the data?’, ‘have data been generated in an unbiased fashion?’ or ‘have all results been reported?’. The site visitor / assessor / auditor selects tests from the RU and organizes data transfer from studies for in-depth review, based on the study overview sent by the RU beforehand. During the course of the spot check, the site visitor / assessor / auditor can arrange data discussion meetings with scientists from the RU to ensure proper understanding of the data. At the end of the review, feedback will be provided to the RU and a report with observations will be sent. The RU may be requested to respond to these observations. In scope for a spot check are all studies…. (here we could set priorities, e.g., published studies, critical assays etc.).

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+A spot check is a focused review of a selection of experimental records, reports, procedures or lab environment at random or scheduled timepoints against predefined expectations and performance standards.
 For a spot check, records / data / experiments may be selected randomly to see how well the RU is doing by finding answers to questions such as:
-- how easy is it to retrieve and reconstruct the data?
+* how easy is it to retrieve and reconstruct the data?
-- are study protocols completed prior to the start of experiments?
+* are study protocols completed prior to the start of experiments?
-- have data been generated in an unbiased fashion?
+* have data been generated in an unbiased fashion?
-- have all results been reported?
+* have all results been reported?
 Spot checks are typically conducted by a [https://eqipd-toolbox.paasp.net/wiki/1.5.2.3_Process_owner Process owner] or someone to whom this task is delegated. EQIPD does not require that the research unit maintains documentation on spot checks conducted and leaves it up to the Process owner and the research unit to decide how often spot checks are conducted, how the outcome is evaluated, discussed, reported or followed up. Some research units opt to build key performance indicators that quantify the outcome of the spot checks of key processes.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Within the EQIPD framework, spot check is an examination of various activities and processes to make sure that everything is being done according to the expectations.
-For a spot check, data / experiments may be selected randomly to see how well the RU is doing by finding answers to questions such as:
+For a spot check, records / data / experiments may be selected randomly to see how well the RU is doing by finding answers to questions such as:
 - how easy is it to retrieve and reconstruct the data?
 - are study protocols completed prior to the start of experiments?
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 - have all results been reported?
-Spot checks are typically conducted by a [https://eqipd-toolbox.paasp.net/wiki/1.5.2.3_Process_owner Process owner] or someone to whom this task is delegated.
+Spot checks are typically conducted by a [https://eqipd-toolbox.paasp.net/wiki/1.5.2.3_Process_owner Process owner] or someone to whom this task is delegated. EQIPD does not require that the research unit maintains documentation on spot checks conducted and leaves it up to the Process owner and the research unit to decide how often spot checks are conducted, how the outcome is evaluated, discussed, reported or followed up. Some research units opt to build key performance indicators that quantify the outcome of the spot checks of key processes.
 If a research unit undergoes an internal or external assessment, the assessors may also conduct spot checks to evaluate the overall performance and to identify processes or specific examples for an in-depth discussion with the research unit.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 - have all results been reported?
-Spot checks are typically conducted by a [[Process owner]] or someone to whom this task is delegated.
+Spot checks are typically conducted by a [https://eqipd-toolbox.paasp.net/wiki/1.5.2.3_Process_owner Process owner] or someone to whom this task is delegated.
 If a research unit undergoes an internal or external assessment, the assessors may also conduct spot checks to evaluate the overall performance and to identify processes or specific examples for an in-depth discussion with the research unit.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 - have all results been reported?
-Spot checks are typically conducted by a [[Process Owner]] or someone to whom this task is delegated.
+Spot checks are typically conducted by a [[Process owner]] or someone to whom this task is delegated.
 If a research unit undergoes an internal or external assessment, the assessors may also conduct spot checks to evaluate the overall performance and to identify processes or specific examples for an in-depth discussion with the research unit.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 13 August 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	For a spot check, data / experiments may be selected randomly to see how well the RU is doing by finding answers to questions ~~like ‘how~~ easy is it to retrieve and reconstruct the data?~~’, ‘have~~ data been generated in an unbiased fashion?~~’ or ‘have~~ all results been reported?’. ~~The site visitor / assessor / auditor selects tests from~~ the RU and ~~organizes data transfer from studies~~ for in-depth ~~review, based on the study overview sent by the RU beforehand. During the course of the spot check, the site visitor / assessor / auditor can arrange data~~ discussion ~~meetings~~ with ~~scientists from the RU to ensure proper understanding of the data. At~~ the end of the review, feedback will be provided to the RU and a report with observations will be sent. The RU may be requested to respond to these observations. In scope for a spot check are all studies…. (here we could set priorities, e.g., published studies, critical assays etc.).	+
		+	Spot check is a a close look at a few items in a group.
		+
		+	Within the EQIPD framework, spot check is an examination of various activities and processes to make sure that everything is being done according to the expectations.
		+
		+	For a spot check, data / experiments may be selected randomly to see how well the RU is doing by finding answers to questions such as:
		+	- how easy is it to retrieve and reconstruct the data?
		+	- are study protocols completed prior to the start of experiments?
		+	- have data been generated in an unbiased fashion?
		+	- have all results been reported?
		+
		+	Spot checks are typically conducted by a [[Process Owner]] or someone to whom this task is delegated.
		+
		+	If a research unit undergoes an internal or external assessment, the assessors may also conduct spot checks to evaluate the overall performance and to identify processes or specific examples for an in-depth discussion with the research unit.